The key here is recognizing that slope = rise/run (or, in this question, y/x). According to this question the slope of that ramp is 7/16. We can actually BACKSOLVE this one, by basically taking our answers and plugging them into rise/run (or, like we said, y/x) to see which one will give us that same fraction. We know our rise (or y) is 3.5 feet. With backsolve, always try (C) first:
(C) 3.5/20 = 7/40. Nope. Way too long on bottom. Go smaller.
(B) 3.5/12.5 = 7/25. Still too long on bottom, but getting warmer...
(A) 3.5/8 = 7/16. BINGO.
Showing posts with label Test2Sec5. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Test2Sec5. Show all posts
4/14/10
Test 2 Section 5 - #14 (page 468)
Tough one (grid-ins usually are). The solution to this one, though, can be found by PLUGGING IN (with a little BACKSOLVE flavor added in for good measure)! Just start by trying any number for x. How about x = 3? Just to be clear, we're looking for f(3) to be LESS THAN 3 (that's what they say in the question: f(a) < a).
Ok, so that didn't work; 8 is not less than 3. But here's where that BACKSOLVE flavor comes in: now we have a better idea of how the pieces fit together. We want x to get a little bigger, so that 3x gets closer to 17. That way, f(x) will be small. Why not try x = 5 next?
GREAT! 2 < 5, so x = 5 works! (A few other numbers will work too: anything between 4.25 and 8.5...though you'd probably be best to stick with integers and just try 5, 6, or 7.)
f(x) = |3x - 17|
f(3) = |3(3) - 17|
f(3) = |9-17|
f(3) = |-8|
f(3) = 8
Ok, so that didn't work; 8 is not less than 3. But here's where that BACKSOLVE flavor comes in: now we have a better idea of how the pieces fit together. We want x to get a little bigger, so that 3x gets closer to 17. That way, f(x) will be small. Why not try x = 5 next?
f(5) = |3(5) - 17|
f(5) = |15-17|
f(5) = |-2|
f(5) = 2
GREAT! 2 < 5, so x = 5 works! (A few other numbers will work too: anything between 4.25 and 8.5...though you'd probably be best to stick with integers and just try 5, 6, or 7.)
Test 2 Section 5 - #16 (page 468)
For questions like this, it's best to just start listing the numbers that are "tri-factorable" (by listing numbers that are made by multiplying 3 consecutive positive integers, starting with the lowest positive integers we can). It won't take us long:
1 x 2 x 3 = 6
2 x 3 x 4 = 24
3 x 4 x 5 = 60
4 x 5 x 6 = 120
5 x 6 x 7 = 210
6 x 7 x 8 = 336
7 x 8 x 9 = 504
8 x 9 x 10 = 720
9 x 10 x 11 = 990
10x11x12 = 1320 (Oops, too high!)
So how many were under 1000? 9 of them.
1 x 2 x 3 = 6
2 x 3 x 4 = 24
3 x 4 x 5 = 60
4 x 5 x 6 = 120
5 x 6 x 7 = 210
6 x 7 x 8 = 336
7 x 8 x 9 = 504
8 x 9 x 10 = 720
9 x 10 x 11 = 990
So how many were under 1000? 9 of them.
Test 2 Section 5 - #15 (page 468)
This one has hints of PLUGiIN and BACKSOLVE, even though it's a grid-in! We don't need any of that stuff about how many candies are in the jar...that's just extraneous information. All we need to know is where Ari's starting from (3 red, 4 green) and how many more he takes. We want him to have more red pieces than green pieces by the end, but just barely. Here's how I set it up:
Now it's kinda clear where to go: add one more red (and one less green):
| RED | GREEN | Comments |
| 3 | 4 | This is our starting point. |
| +7 | +6 | Just plugging in 2 numbers that are close together and add up to 13. |
| =10 | =10 | OOPS! That's not enough red...Ari has the same amount of each color now. |
Now it's kinda clear where to go: add one more red (and one less green):
| RED | GREEN | Comments |
| 3 | 4 | This is our starting point (again). |
| +8 | +5 | Plug in new numbers. |
| =11 | =9 | That'll do it! Any less red and he'd have the same number of each (as we saw above). |
11/23/09
Test 2 Section 5 - #18 (page 468)
Just fill in what you know and work it out:
You know the side of each square is k. So that means the AREA of each square will be k2. Since there are ten squares total, that means the ENTIRE area will be 10k2. So a=10k2.
Now get the perimeter: just count the number of sides that are bolded. There are 16 sides to the figure, and since each side equals k, that's 16k. So p=16k.
Since the question says p=a, that means 16k=10k2. Divide both sides by k to cancel it out, and you get 16=10k. Then divide by 10 on both sides and you get 16/10=k, which reduces down to 8/5=k.
You know the side of each square is k. So that means the AREA of each square will be k2. Since there are ten squares total, that means the ENTIRE area will be 10k2. So a=10k2.
Now get the perimeter: just count the number of sides that are bolded. There are 16 sides to the figure, and since each side equals k, that's 16k. So p=16k.
Since the question says p=a, that means 16k=10k2. Divide both sides by k to cancel it out, and you get 16=10k. Then divide by 10 on both sides and you get 16/10=k, which reduces down to 8/5=k.
Test 2 Section 5 - #17 (page 468)
First write out the expressions for each of the two carriers:
Carrier A is $1.00 for the first 20 minutes and $0.07 for every minute after 20, so that expression for the total cost would be: 1+0.07(t-20). (The "t-20" is how you write the phrase "numbers of minutes past 20.")
Carrier B is simply $0.06 per minute, so that expression would be: 0.06t.
The question asks for when the costs would be the same, so set the expressions equal to each other: 1+0.07(t-20) = 0.06t. Distribute to get 1+0.07t-1.4 = 0.06t, and combine like terms to get: 0.01t = 0.4. Solve that to get t = 40.
Carrier A is $1.00 for the first 20 minutes and $0.07 for every minute after 20, so that expression for the total cost would be: 1+0.07(t-20). (The "t-20" is how you write the phrase "numbers of minutes past 20.")
Carrier B is simply $0.06 per minute, so that expression would be: 0.06t.
The question asks for when the costs would be the same, so set the expressions equal to each other: 1+0.07(t-20) = 0.06t. Distribute to get 1+0.07t-1.4 = 0.06t, and combine like terms to get: 0.01t = 0.4. Solve that to get t = 40.
Test 2 Section 5 - #7 (page 465)
If you have a graphing calculator, this one is probably easiest to do using Plug-In. First, plug in anything you want for a... let's go with a=3. Now graph that equation: y=3x2+2. Next graph the SECOND equation (y=x2+2) and compare the two graphs. You'll see that the second graph is wider than the first, so the answer is (B).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)